Heres a great idea write a frontend that u can type a human request in then pass that to chatgpt to generate an appropriate sql query then automatically send it. What could possibly go wrong.

Hell no they got no chance delivering it on time and on budget but thats literally every single government project in the history of government projects.

Sorry hit reply to the wrong comment couldn’t be fucked to fix it.

Well then the coalition are fucking morons then. Have they actually said what they are going to use? Thw guardian references SMRs cos thats the only one that was included in the csiro report despite not a single watt of power being generate by them ask the csiro why they did this?

U can obviously use asymmetric key cryptography someone sends their public key u encrypt with that then upload they then decrypt.

Nvidia gme and btc. And obviously more time with the dog.

Open source or source available or foss let’s be specific cos the CCP is hardly gonna be a charity. Does it know about tianamin square?

What about the famed 4th hole

Manjaro xfce

Have to fix dock drivers every time I update kernel. 3rd and 4th screen reside to randomly swap sometimes. Unplugging and replicating laptop doesnt switch taskbar back to main monitor when plugged back in. Lap5op freezes when i run out of my 4gb of ram. AutoCAD runs perfectly in a vm as long as I’m fine with no graphics acceleration. Battery dies in 45minutes (old laptop). Boot after putting in luks key complains about missing partition but still boots fine (started after accidentally erasing kernel and having to replace with a live usb).

Fixed vscodium by installing it directly flatpaks have issues for code editors.

Overall everything is fine.

What order is this meant to be in?

Why do u need 3?

Facts all of it. References go look at said csiro report then go look at the style of the majority of nuclear reactors ever build in human history and explain to me why csiro neglected to include the most popular most built most experienced design style in human history. The rest of what I said is simply pointing out that the guardian is using a completely fair and justified lib bashing campaign to bash the single good thing the libs included.

Its just me bing pissed at the current media and most peoples inability to recognise that some of the ideas by people u disagree with are good ideas. And some of the ideas of people u agree with are bad. Why are we picking teams then blindly supporting out team while blindly bashing the other team. Take the good ideas from both ridicule the bad from both and we will be in a far better place.

Basically anythibg that isnt SMR like what the French and Japanese have been doing for years.

This is complete shit. The quote the csiro analysis that neglected the cheapest and most widespread nuclear reactor design because it doesnt fit the narrative. The rest of the article is spent bashing the rest of their energy policy which seems pretry fair to me. This headline is completely inaccurate. Just because they rest of the coilititions policy is shit why bash the one good thing about it in ur headline like its the be all and end all. If i though the guardian had brains then i might say they are doing this maliciously but they aren’t bright enough for that.

Isn’t there something in the constitution about the government can’t force a religion upon the people cos this sounds a hell of a lot like that.

Liquid salt is good for small heigh density systems mainly submarines. SMR is bullshit and far more expensive that other reactors (mainly due to the lack of expertise or good designs available). SMR is the silicon valley tech bro bs reactor. We gotta stop fuckin around and go to Japan or France and be like hey here’s a couple billion we like that one put it here.

Nuclear is fucking awsome and had the ability to fix our energy issues. There is strong evidance that the oil corporations are actually responsible for manufacturing nuclear fear narrative because it poses an actually economically viable alternative.

Thats not to mention the CSIRO who access tally forgot to include the most economically viable nuclear energy method of there analysis of “all” energy production methods. So much for independence.

How does piefed compare python/flask is far easyer to develop I really think moving away from developer with such extreme politics is a good idea.

Yo thats cool would be nice if this could operate in a federated manner. Would give it the robustness to withstand the alphabet bois.

Why people hating on this? I guess the not psyop was very effective.