Reader and sometimes writer. Ukrainian. Also a programmer, among other things.
If you like something you read — boost it. This is how things get to people on Mastodon.
@yogthos 5. Use of emotionally charged language: The words like ‘hysteria’, ‘atrocities’, ‘rampages’ play with the emotions of the readers, leading them to take sides without looking into the facts.
Such manipulation could be intended to steer readers towards a particular point of view on these complex geopolitical issues.
@yogthos 3. Suppressed evidence or half-truths: The phrase “silence over the rampages,” suggests that there is no media coverage of issues in the occupied West Bank, which isn’t completely accurate. Many outlets do cover this topic, so the statement can be seen as manipulative.
@yogthos 2. Loaded comparisons: By comparing two significantly different geopolitical situations, the writer is employing the technique of a false equivalence. The comparison is manipulative because it’s designed to imply an unfair bias in media coverage without fully demonstrating it.
@yogthos This text uses several manipulative techniques:
@yogthos oh my god dude, you’re a gold mine!
@yogthos only people who never lived in USSR can like communism. I don’t blame them — it all sounds so pink unicorns and flowers in theory. It’s a shame we have to fight a war against the remains of that pile of filth called Soviet Union.
@planet @clojure they lost me when they dropped datalog