• 7 Posts
  • 89 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 7th, 2023

help-circle
  • I will say however, from experience, that there is basically a 1% chance any of this info would affect the opinion of somebody who supports her. But I would hope that your wife would be more willing to listen to you and consider your viewpoint.

    It is admittedly difficult to argue that Rowling is transphobic. She’s relatively careful with her own words and rarely does more than dog whistle. Instead you have to look at who she associates with and what causes she lends her massive finances to. And unfortunately, conservatives who are stuck in the “racism is when you say black people are bad” mindset, aren’t going to be super receptive to an argument which rests on proving that JK Rowling’s transphobia manifests primarily in her support of transphobic organizations and systems.


  • I’ll put my copy-paste argument here:

    She believes trans women aren’t women. She believes trans women are only lying in order to get close to women and rape them. JK Rowling self identifies as a a TERF, or “Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminist”.

    Rowling donates money to the LGB alliance a UK “charity” that actively lobbies against trans rights, and has fought for the continued legality of trans conversion therapy.

    Rowling has tweeted out in support of one Maya Forstater, a woman who was fired and has become a martyr for intentionally misgendering trans people, and once again perpetuating the idea that trans men are rapists. Rowling keeps pushing the idea and propping up those who agree with her.

    Rowling has posted to advertise for an online shop that sells, among other things, anti-trans merch. The store is ran by an Angela C. Wild, a founding member of “Get The L Out”, an organization that has in its mission statement “We stand against any kind of misogynistic politics and systems that prioritise men’s interests: queer politics and transgenderism, right-wing politics, left-wing politics” etc.

    Under the pen name Robert Galbraith (a name coincidentally shared by a 20th century proponent for conversion therapy), Rowling had published multiple transphobic books, writing one book about a serial killer who dresses as a woman to lure in unsuspecting victims, and another with a self insert character who is killed after “speaking out” against transsexuality.

    This is just the tip of the iceberg. There’s a great video that goes into much more detail than I have here about the causes she supports and the right-wing activists and think tanks she associates with and gives money to.




  • rustyspoon@beehaw.orgtoAtheism@lemmy.ml"Atheists are so mean!"
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not a member of this sub, this just popped up on my feed. I disagree with the general sentiment of this post. I stopped calling myself an atheist years ago because many atheists I interact with are bitter and antagonistic, kind of like how anti-natalists attack people who choose to have kids. People aren’t concern trolling, this is a legitimate and common experience. Maybe it’s a minority but they’re the ones making noise, and I find that these voices take over in atheist spaces.

    I’m anti-religion because I dislike the institutional power religious organizations, and because these organizations often champion causes which I believe I prejudiced and harmful. It’s not because I believe people putting faith in a higher power are unintelligent, or because I want to wear a shirt that says “if you believe in God, fuck you.” And those are the attitudes and actions that made me distance myself from atheism.


  • My optimistic outlook is that most of the musical spaces I reside in will likely shun or be immune to whatever norms develop regarding AI. I personally care deeply about the fact that the music I listen to is made deliberately and thoughtfully by a human being, and I like to think there are many others who feel the same way.

    More cynically though, I’m worried about AI taking market share away from music “made by humans”. If this becomes the norm, maybe there just won’t be money in doing things the old fashioned way. Maybe the type of musicians I want to listen to would be discouraged from making music in this new climate.











  • I’m not quite sure what aspect of her music you’re trying to find more of, and it sounds like it might be multiple things.

    If you’re looking for, specifically, modern popular country music sung by a woman about romance/womens issues, I’d recommend the album Plastic Hearts by Miley Cyrus, or Rainbow by Kesha (which sounds weird if you haven’t listened to her since Tik Tok, but her sound has really changed).

    As far as artists endorsed by her, it looks like you’re already listening to Olivia Rodrigo, but definitely check out Sour if you haven’t heard it yet. I’d also recommend Lana Del Rey and Phoebe Bridgers, who have both been featured on Taylor Swift songs, and are both great story tellers (although they’re typically more somber than Taylor Swift, more like Folklore).

    As for some more personal picks from me that are maybe a bit more out of the box: I really like Car Seat Headrest. They’re an indie band that has a bit more of a DIY sound, but their music is incredibly emotional and the storytelling is compelling. This song is my favorite from them, but most of their stuff is more about romance than this. I also really like the bands Modern Baseball and The Front Bottoms. Both are a bit more emo but they capture a lot of the heartbreak and teen angst that was present on early Taylor Swift stuff.








  • This is like saying there are no racially discriminatory hiring practices, employers are just hiring the most qualified people (which ignores that it’s harder for disenfranchised people to gain those qualifications). That is to say: people aren’t arguing that this situation doesn’t make sense, they’re arguing that it’s wrong. And it doesn’t stop being wrong just because the people involved had no bad intentions.

    Expect to butt heads with more and more people in the coming years if you argue by appealing to the status quo, because an increasing number of people are starting to take issue with the entire system as it stands.