Digital självständighet låter för dyrt för Sollefteå. Försök samverka och få skalfördelar istället, utan att för den skull bli beroende av leverantörer utanför Sverige. Sundsvall driver mycket opensource-lösningar som de vill utveckla tillsammans med andra kommuner.

The article says “sometimes provide less-accurate and less-truthful responses to users who have lower English proficiency”. This is what I was commenting on. I don’t have enough understanding to comment on your case.

I mean… isn’t it just logical that if you express yourself ambiguously, you are more likely to get a poor response? Humans and chatbots alike need clarity to respond appropriately. I don’t think we can ever expect things to work differently.

That’s a somewhat odd statement coming from a stranger on the internet but I’m having one of those days where I’ll take anything that’s on offer. So thanks, I think I needed to hear that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullshit_Jobs

Graeber states that more than half of societal work is pointless, both large parts of some jobs and five types of entirely pointless jobs:

• Flunkies, who serve to make their superiors feel important, e.g., receptionists, administrative assistants, door attendants, store greeters;
• Goons, who act to harm or deceive others on behalf of their employer, or to prevent other goons from doing so, e.g., lobbyists, corporate lawyers, telemarketers, public relations specialists;
• Duct tapers, who temporarily fix problems that could be fixed permanently, e.g., programmers repairing shoddy code, airline desk staff who calm passengers with lost luggage;
• Box tickers, who create the appearance that something useful is being done when it is not, e.g., survey administrators, in-house magazine journalists, corporate compliance officers, academic administration;[14]
• Taskmasters, who create extra work for those who do not need it, e.g., middle management, leadership professionals.[1][4]

People say they slept like a baby, but have you ever slept like a hamster?

Katsudon

I mean I’d do it for the good of mankind. Except I wouldn’t actually be watching.

I always have issues with YouTube, and so should you

This sounds like a US thing, not an AI thing

I mean if they’re reading books in the first place you’re probably already in the clear

Phrasing!

On that we agree.

The left is realizing that. The problem is that the right isn’t.

I’m unsure how most of what you said relates to the parent comment. Did you forget to drink your coffee before commenting?

You: Cool! The entrance to the subway is around the corner.

Bob: Thanks for the help, friend!

You: You’re welcome! Good luck.

Not great, not terrible

The cognitive ceiling. Research by Ericsson, Mark, and Newport shows that 3-4 hours is the daily maximum for concentrated effort. Beyond that, diminishing returns.

“Diminishing returns” is not the same as zero returns. You’ll get more coding done if you work eight hours a day than four hours a day. There’s certainly a point where the quality gets so low that the returns are negative (by introducing bugs / technical debt / stuff you have to rewrite the next day), but in my experience 4 hours is not it.

In fact, if the problem is very complicated then it might even take you three hours just to get up to speed with what you were doing the day before.

But the article is about what material is used as a conductor

Are you implying that gold isolates better from interference than copper?