• 1 Post
  • 1.01K Comments
Joined vor 2 Jahren
cake
Cake day: 24. Juli 2023

help-circle








  • untorquer@lemmy.worldtoADHD Women@lemmy.worldIt is crazy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    vor 11 Tagen

    Oh i see the point of confusion. If taken literally yeah that’s how it could be read. I read a sarcastic tone in the whole statement. They make an otherwise serious complaint then use a humorous informal slang like “rawdog” which demeans their own authority in the statement.

    In this case the sarcasm extends to the word “let” which i think is pointing to how underperforming individuals get diagnosis and medication much more often. That they are given care while well performing individuals are uncared for.

    It does fit the definition of the word as well, to allow someone to do something by not doing anything to stop them. In this case the not doing anything to stop them part refers to that lack of provision of care.









  • If one starts with very low or no tolerance then even minimal amounts can be a bit much. A higher tolerance can make that more comfortable. At these low doses, a small variation can impact the experience overall and some people will like it with a slightly higher dose which they need to build a tolerance to smooth out the harsher effects of.

    Not sure if that’s what they meant but in this way the word can be correctly used.