• 0 Posts
  • 670 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle
  • 1 - a markov chain only takes previous tokens as input.

    2 - It uses a function (in the mathematical sense, so same input results in same output, completely stateless) to generate a set of probabilities for what the next token might be.

    3 - The most probable token is picked, else randomness (temperature) is inserted here to choose a different token occasionally.

    an llm’s internals, the part that’s trained is literally the function used in step 2. You could have this function implemented a number of ways, ex you could build a huge table and consult it. Or you could generate it somehow. You could train a big neural network that takes previous tokens as input, and outputs probabilities of tokens as output. You then enumerate its outputs for every possible permutation of inputs and there’s your table. This would take too much time and space, so we just run the function on-demand instead. Exact same result. It can be very smart and notice correlations, but ultimately it generates a (virtual) huge static table. This is a completely deterministic process. A trained NN is still a (huge) mathematical function. So the big network that they spend resources training is basically the function used in step 2.

    Step 3 is the cause of hallucinations. It’s the only nondeterministic part. And it’s not part of the llm itself in any way. No matter how smarter the neural network gets, the hallucinations are introduced mainly in step 3. So no, they won’t be solving the LLM hallucination problem anytime soon.



  • vrightertoTechnology@lemmy.worldAI trained on AI garbage spits out AI garbage.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    and that is exactly how a predictive text algorithm works.

    • some tokens go in

    • they are processed by a deterministic, static statistical model, and a set of probabilities (always the same, deterministic, remember?) comes out.

    • pick the word with the highest probability, add it to your initial string and start over.

    • if you want variety, add some randomness and don’t just always pick the most probable next token.

    Coincidentally, this is exactly how llms work. It’s a big markov chain, but with a novel lossy compression algorithm on its state transition table. The last point is also the reason why, if anyone says they can fix llm hallucinations, they’re lying.



  • you almost always get better efficiency at scale. If the same work is done by lots of different machines instead of one datacenter, they’d be using more energy overall. You’d be doing the same work, but not on chips specifically designed for the task. If it’s already really inefficient at scale, then you’re just sol.