It’s not because you don’t like the party that it should not get visibility. You can’t be for democracy and against giving visibility to a party that represent a non negligeable percentage of the population. If that party is gaining such popularity, maybe there is an underlying issue that drive it, like why one province did not get to sign the constitution 🫣
Any concrete proof this happened ?
From the article : “However, the EU, together with Kyiv, plans to propose specific favourable adjustments for Ukraine thereafter.”
I use proton, but I think the calendar is a paid option. Tuta seems to include the calendar in their free tier Side note, I used to selfhost my mails, but over time this became a pain and I would not recommend anymore
“He tells FOX 9 a bottle of wine ranges from $30 to $45 depending on the bottle.” Even with tariffs, not sure he will be competitive 😅
Sorry, what is the context ?
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
I just migrated to proton 🥲
I’m highlighting that EU’s deterrance is interpreted as a threat by Russian, who try to expand their border by mean of war (or special military operation 🤣) and spend 30% of their government’s budget toward military readiness, because they prepare for war against other countries.
Most points are laughable, including “Macron’s nuclear remarks: The French president proposed sharing nuclear deterrents within Europe and only stopped short of declaring war on the Russian Federation.” Why does our deterrence feel like a threat for Russia ? What are you planning with 30% of your government’s spending on military ? 🤣
For point 1 : From my understanding, it is a bit more than not signing a piece of paper. Not participating in the signature of a founding document like a constitution seems like a good recipe to create resentment long term. If it was just an admin task to sign it, why not re-open that document for signature ? I’m not even judging the situation that lead to this, just the impact it has today. For point 2 : While I don’t disagree that it’s a bit odd to have a party at the federal level that defend provincial interest, there is an underlying issue that lead peoples to vote for them. And no one is really interested to have this embarassing discussion 😅 For point 3 : I’m not knowledgeable enough to say if Quebec receive or give more, even if I doubt that this is a black and white answer