Alter, der Artikel ließt sich wie als hätt den jemand geschrieben der 0 Verständnis von der Technik, Umsetzung und den Effekt der legislative hat; und noch dazu nur den packungstext gelesen hat, diesen nicht weiter hinterfragt hat und dann leider diesen Artikel schrieb.

The raw data would be interesting to mess with, do you have it?

Gut aber auch irgendwie beunruhigend. Das hört sich so an als hätten sie gemerkt dass es nicht durch geht und indem sie es vertagen ersparen sie sich ein definitives ‘nein’.

Mal sehen, aber ich glaube wir werden bald wieder was hören.

Cool! The arecibo message https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arecibo_message comes to mind with some of the designes!

This seems incredibly interesting, but the idea of a ‘general purpose syncing service’, in the way he describes it, makes my head scream’security concern’. In general the way it’s described the format is not fixed for these services so your data might as well be encrypted in any arbitrary way I think?

But knowing this wouldn’t this kind of general purpose syncing service need some way of identifying what data it is even syncing? Unless you encooperate something grand like the signal protocol (as in encrypted anonymous messaging) you d always run a security risk if the service you use for syncing is not self-controlled?

If anyone has more insight on this I’d be very interested, it seems like a very good concept.

It sounds to me like anything other than p2p local syncing with some protocol is a confidentiality no-go.

So according to this I am a determinist turned absurdist? Neat!

From a technological perspective I think this arms race is very interesting to watch and observe.

From a user perspective, I hope that enough people get fed up by this that they leave YouTube and the creators that can currently only create on YouTube, since all of their users are there, go somewhere else with their users.

I can dream…

‘kermits mean girlfriend’ is just such a wonderful description haha

As someone who sees these articles, who should I not vote for? Is there some ranking for ‘most asshole-ish politician’ regarding the EU? I know every politician has somewhat dirt on them but I’d love to know what to avoid since apparently some of those turds are worse than others.

This is what I had in mind as well; If you had to how would you add a beamer to this that could use your jellyfin/plex server?

Ideally I’d want a pi or mini pc behind the beamer that I can switch on/off remotely so that part is not always on

Okay I never knew that, I would also accept tips for setting up a star trek beamer though xD

Someone who knows this please tell me what I am misunderstanding, though this is not related particularly to this article.

What is “gender affirming care”? When i hear that I am thinking of some racist dad who is forcing their son to go to some camp to get the gay ‘affirmed/corrected’ out of him or something along those lines.

I feel like I keep misreading the different definitions of what is meant where and why.

In general the article seems to be a summary of current legislative actions that are ongoing between big tech and EU. Though in the article it’s worded with the much more fitting ‘game of chicken between EU and Big Tech’ rather than something like the title, but I guess “drop dead has a better ring to it”…

I general the article has a lightly optimistic tone, which I very deeply hope holds true.

Beg? Or am I misunderstanding this?

… Auf ein Mindestmaß von Intelligenz bei irgendeinem Menschen zu pledieren ist sehr riskant…

Aahh OK so they are the IDFs responsibility and they are being purposefully neglegent, makes sense to be trialed for that.

Assuming these are unaffiliated civilians (which I am assuming here that these people are just assholes who hate Palestinians) can they be trialed for this as a war crime?

Anon feels more manly when he is handling his cats feces?

Which would also be worse than the events being unrelated. In the simplest case it’d be guilt-tripping ( you owe me!) or at worst some sort of odd blackmail.

[…]Plants vs. Zombies Jordan Adams, and Director Partnerships at EAX Matthew Angeleri.

Adams would also send female coworkers pornographic videos and even reference them in EA Slack conversations

While that seemed like an act of goodwill, Angeleri privately sexually harassed said female coworkers and even followed it up with videos of himself having lewd acts performed on himself.

Why the article can’t just state what the allegations are and at whom is just annoying, so here you go.

What confuses me a bit is the sentence just before the allegations to Angeleri:

As for Matthew Angeleri, he invited his female coworkers to stay at his home with his wife while visiting Vegas where they were given free room and lodging. While that seemed like an act of goodwill, Angeleri privately sexually harassed said female coworkers and even followed it up with videos of himself having lewd acts performed on himself.

Like… What? What is the logical connection between these two sentences? There could be months or years between those two events? How do these two relate? This reads as two completely separate events. So one could just be an act of goodwill and afterwards he decided to be a prick. Or, first the was a prick and then felt bad and offered the coworker a place to stay?

And if the two events were concurrent that makes it immensely more creepy.