• skillissuer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 months ago

    You understand that getting a list of sources and checking them is easier than finding them on your own, right?

    that’s one weirdass assumption. when you know what are you looking for, the opposite is true. few months back i’ve authored a review chapter in my (very narrow) field, and while “getting a list of sources” part took maybe a day or two with a few scopus searches, combing through them, finding out what’s relevant and making a coherent story out of all of this was harder and took more time. if you don’t know where even to start, maybe you should ask a professional? especially when alternative is just going in raw into the court of law, defending whatever is at stake with a few paragraphs of possibly nonsensical spicy autocomplete output

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      So you are saying that you spent one day or two? And AI could have done it in 3 seconds? So using AI you could have saved one day or two and… That is bad? Somehow? Because it didn’t do all the work for you or…?

      • skillissuer
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        i’m not convinced that spicy autocomplete would generate passable crude list of articles to consider in a way that would save me any time. already when going through scopus output i’ve made a fair selection (rejecting maybe 80%) of articles, then i had at least to skim them to tell whether it’s what i’m looking for, then i’ve narrowed them all down from few hundred to 80ish. then in some cases i went through literature in these articles to check if i wasn’t missing something. then i got to arrange them in some order and make a story out of all of that. all in all, these next steps took few weeks, so one day is positively swift. spicy autocomplete is utterly useless if it outputs few k of references, or throws out actually important work, or makes shit up and spits out nonexistent DOIs, because all of that makes next steps longer, or threatens to make the passable crude references list incomplete in important ways. i’ll pass

        • Tja@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          You’re not convinced? I could whip up a script to do it in half a day, and I’m really not that good of a dev anymore.

          Skimming to see if that’s what you’re looking for is another task where Ai is great at.

          • skillissuer
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            we disagree on what my job as an author is

            anyway, if you haven’t noticed, you’re already banned on awful.systems and i’m also done with you

            • Tja@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Well, I have no idea what your job is, I just used the description you provided.

              Also, no idea what awful.systems is.