• MachineFab812
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    Someone needs to colorize the top pic. I’m not convinced they were any less vibrant or peace-loving then. They just happened to understand it would take violence to protect, well, anything that needs protecting.

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      18 days ago

      Usually this format implies highlighting a significant change between “then” and “now”, but I really think it just highlights “the first picture was taken before 1978”, and and “the specific of the struggle have changed, but not the presence”

      I’m not entirely sure what they were trying to highlight.

      • MachineFab812
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        17 days ago

        The bottom pic reflects much more of a soft-sell, non-violence-and-family-friendly-only take on the topic. The top pic leaves getting one’s face smashed in, with bricks or dildoes, firmly on the table, where it should be when one considers human rights negotiable.

        • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 days ago

          Totally agree on the hard line stance on human rights.

          I guess I’m just not seeing what you’re seeing. They’re both pictures of people mostly holding signs and peacefully marching. A woman holding a sign and smiling doesn’t scream face smashing to me.

          If that was the point they were trying to make, then maybe actually using an image from the stonewall riots might have conveyed that a bit better than two sets of images of people peacefully marching.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 days ago

        The biggest changes have been the social acceptance of homosexuality.

        Looking at the question of people’s perception on homosexual relationships in the GSS between 1973 and 2022, the percentage of Americana who view homosexual relationships as being “Not wrong at all” went from 10% to 61%. And for the first 20 years of that period, it pretty much stayed around 10%.

        The question of homosexual sex itself has only been included 5 times on the GSS. The earliest in 1991 and the most-recent in 2018. In 1991 is was 11% and in 2018 was 55%.

        In 1973, 1/3rd of people believed a gay person shouldn’t even be allowed to speak in public.

        The somewhat scarier number is reagrdining homosexual books in public libraries, simply because there’s a slight uptick in banning them between 2020 and 2022, and while more-recent GSS numbers aren’t out, we have been seeing lots of book-bans in the news…

        Other fun stuff from the GSS:

        40% of white reponsants were in favor of a law banning interracial marriage in the 70s, and - more interestingly - up until they stopped asking the question in 2002 more democrats supported laws prohibiting interracial marriage than Republicans.

        Support for abortion “for any reason” didn’t cross the 50% threshold until the Trump Presidency, and it’s pretty much entirely a trend on the Democratic side. The Dem and Rep voters weren’t that far apart until very recently.