• finn_der_mensch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 个月前

    VPNs for internet access, at least the way they are advertised

      • Blaster M@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 个月前

        Most of them are owned by one company. The only independent ones are Mullvad, Proton, and IVPN. For the most part, you want to Tor and never sign into anything if you are being ultra private about your browsing.

          • dan@upvote.au
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 个月前

            AirVPN are probably the best. They’re independent, more transparent than the other providers, and support port forwarding.

        • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 个月前

          They don’t give you complete privacy, no. On the other hand, if what you’re concerned about is your workplace seeing that you’re fucking off at work, or a Hollywood studio suing you for pirating a 20 year old television show that isn’t available to buy or stream, well, a VPN is just fine. In regards to piracy, it obfuscates a lot of your internet behavior from your ISP, so they aren’t able to easily track what you’re doing either.

          If I was worried about gov’t level threats, Tails, Tor, and public, unsecured WiFi would be the only thing I’d be using.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 个月前

      I hate that these commercial providers are the first thing people think of when they hear “VPN” these days, rather than the actual main use case for a VPN (connecting to a remote network, like a work network, from another location).