• coffinwood
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    53
    ·
    6 months ago

    So you neither pay with money nor by watching ads for a very expensive to maintain service, but you won’t leave it be either.

    I know I’m making myself Unpopular here, but what is it that you’re bringing to the table? Currently you cost YouTube money because streaming video is really expensive. You block out all the ads so every creator is cut off monetization too. This is not a publicly funded library (yet).

    • TragicNotCute@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Streaming data is expensive, but when you’re vertically integrated to the point Google is, it starts to get significantly cheaper. I’ve been paying creators directly through Patreon for literal years now, and I’ve said before I’d be happy to pay for my usage on Google (including a markup), but paying a flat fee and giving a handful of creators a watch a few cents while Google keeps the lion’s share isn’t good enough for me.

      • coffinwood
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        6 months ago

        as long as it’s not your salary that gets ad-blocked.

        • Sabata@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Thats an HR issue at a mega corporation I don’t work for. Not my problem they are mismanaged and poorly scaled.