• PotatoesFall
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    That mindset is the problem. A slightly better UX at the cost of freedom is a bad deal.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      They keep building up these companies with shiti core principles then pika face when corpos do them dirty 🤡

      • PotatoesFall
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s fair! Although I fear big money will always come up with some way to make a “better” UX, either simply because they can afford more/better devs, and often by compromising privacy, accessibility, etc.

        embrace extend extinguish has worked in the past and it can work again

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s a little more than a slightly better UX. Dismissing the entire concept of the instance removes a fair amount of complexity and fragmentation from the equation. There are so many cheerful guides out there about how to select an instance and every single one of them loses 95% of normal people in the first paragraph.

      Having a signup model that people understand helps. Concentrating everything in one schema creates a noticeable increase in density of relevant content. Having corporate money for real hosting and security counts. When you fediverse instance goes down to DDOS or implements crippling safeguards because they can’t keep up with the spam, you really feel how the whole thing is run on a shoestring.