The blogging platform Medium is facing an influx of AI-generated content. CEO Tony Stubblebine says it “doesn’t matter” as long as nobody reads it.

archive.is link

Earlier this year, WIRED asked AI detection startup Pangram Labs to analyze Medium. It took a sampling of 274,466 recent posts over a six week period and estimated that over 47 percent were likely AI-generated. “This is a couple orders of magnitude more than what I see on the rest of the internet,” says Pangram CEO Max Spero. (The company’s analysis of one day of global news sites this summer found 7 percent as likely AI-generated.)

  • Black616Angel
    5·
    23 days ago

    That is why I liked the comparison with articles from 2018. Then you have comparable texts in the same format and can more easily figure out differences in your analysis.
    If true, a jump from 3% to 40% is significant to say the least.

    • Dr. Juande Santander-Vela@astrodon.social
      2·
      23 days ago

      @Black616Angel numbers in the article blurb are 7% for the pre-2018 corpus, and 40% for the post-2018 corpus. That is from less than 1 in 10 to almost 1 in 2, or a coin toss…

      (Update: the blurb from the link speaks about 7% and 47%, but the article itself indeed speaks of 3% and 40%, apologies! That is even more dramatic, going from less than 1 in 20 to 2 out of 5, very close to 1 in 2…)

      • Black616Angel
        2·
        23 days ago

        In 2018, 3.4 percent were estimated as likely AI-generated.

        For 2024, with a sampling of 473 articles published this year, it suspected that just over 40 percent were likely AI-generated.

        My numbers were from the Originality AI part.