• 10 Posts
  • 869 Comments
Joined 3 年前
Cake day: 2023年6月24日
  • Black616AngeltoSelfhosted@lemmy.world•Can someone ELI5 how to upgrade Overseerr now that it's Seerr?English
    2·
    12 天前

    If you have portainer, it should be relatively easy.

    First make a backup of the old config folder (I just copied mine to a new seerr folder) then you insert your current data into the docker compose-file they show at your link and import that as a stack. Boom, done.

    If you have an existing stack with, let’s say, radarr and sonarr and plesk and overseerr, then you can backup the old compose file, and replace only the overseer part with the code from the given compose config.

  • Black616AngeltoWorld News@lemmy.world•Top NATO allies believe cyberattacks on hospitals are an act of war. They’re still struggling to fight back.English
    11·
    14 天前

    Absolutely not. Cyber attacks are not comparable with real attacks, when it comes to counterattacking.

    I mean, how would that even work?

    Let’s do an example: A hospital has a cyber attack.

    Assumption 1: We notice the attack.
    This may sound stupid, but maybe we don’t even notice, that data is stolen and no one ever notices.

    But they want to destroy shit, so they do!

    Okay, let’s say we notice the attack.

    Assumption 2: We notice the attack in time.
    What does that mean, they destroyed stuff, right?

    Yes, but when? Some attacks delete backups for weeks and then destroy the data. We are talking about a government and not a money hungry hacker group here, they have time.

    Maybe all traces of the attack are deleted, before all goes black?

    But we’re the good ones, the smart ones, we notice it in time. Cool.

    Assumption 3: it’s possible to trace the origin.

    Again, how do we do that? Does the code look russian? Maybe Isreal just knows how to trick us. We maybe have no IP, since it came in via USB or CD?

    Okay, we’ll ignore that. We have an IP.

    Assumption 4: The IP tells us, who it was.

    An IP from Israel attacks an american hospital. Clear case, let’s attack back. Right? Wrong.

    The IP is private, so it could be some random dude and you just attacked a country for one person doing a crime? Great job.
    Even worse, maybe the person has a hacked smart fridge and the attack came from Russia. How would you know?

    Okay, let’s say the IP is from a datacenter. Bad example, they rent their servers…

    Okay, the IP is from a government agency. Now we’re talking. They don’t rent; it’s unrealistic, they were hacked. We can attack back!

    Assumption 5: We know, what to do next.

    (This is not a strong argument, but it stills stands)

    But what do we attack? One of their hospitals? Do we start a war with them? Call the embassy?

    All of this on all the prior assumptions…

  • Black616AngeltoNetzkultur / Netzpolitik@feddit.org•Von Kinderhilfswerk bis Lehrerverband: So breit ist die Kritik am Social-Media-Verbot
    3·
    14 天前

    Das Internet ist eine der größten Errungenschaften der Menschheit und jeder, wirklich jeder in jedem Alter, profitiert davon, es möglichst viel zu verwenden,

    Sorry, aber das kannst du nicht ernst meinen. Mal abgesehen davon, dass hoffentlich niemandem daran gelegen ist, dass das eigene dreijährige Kind den ganzen Tag Im Internet hängt, ist dir Formulierung mit “möglichst viel” auch fraglich.

    Ich höre mich jetzt schon an wie ein Opa, aber Kinder müssen aich mal raus und das kommen sie immer weniger. Eltern haben Angst, dass sie entführt oder unerfahren werden und haben entweder keine Zeit oder keine Lust/Kraft, mit ihnen Zeit (draußen) zu verbringen. Das will auch niemand verbieten, das wird nur durch die aktuelle Lage mit der geringen Bezahlung und der Mär vom faulen Bürger immer weiter in den Hintergrund gedrängt.
    Alle sollen immer nur arbeiten und sich abmühen für einen Hungerlohn, dann aber noch ihre Kinder großziehen und kriegen es dann so gedankt. Die Folgen davon sieht man überall.