• unexposedhazard
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Is the app and the OS open source? No? Then please shut the fuck up with your dangerous “advice”. People really still havent understood how this shit works. How is this being upvoted? Corporations do not deserve your trust when they claim things without proving them.

    This is not a joke, this shit affects peoples lives. After spearheading the technology for creeps to stalk people with physical tags, and being the first to experiment with client side communications scanning, how do people still not understand that apple is just as bad as the rest.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Apple is very clear how they make their money. Desirable products at high margins, free customer support, and an ecosystem that encourages the purchase of additional devices and services.

      They have also been very clear about their commitment to privacy, and have consistently led the industry in customer-focused privacy software. It’s the primary reason many customers choose Apple over their competitors.

      Realistically, why would Apple blow up a $3.3T global success for an extra $10M? That 1/330 of the company value. For comparison, Apple sells ~$54M in Apple Pencils every year.

      • unexposedhazard
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        What apple wants or doesnt want to do is completely irrelevant. The fact that they have the ability to remotely modify your device is a disqualifying factor for any rational person thinking about risk of life level privacy.

        Also they can be legally forced to put backdoors into their software while, under the threat of state violence, being prohibited from telling the public about it. Thats how the US legal system works.

        They can also be forced to put on a theater to make it look like they are not giving the feds access btw.

          • unexposedhazard
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            Correct, forced software updates i.e. remotely modifying your device. Also what makes you think they have no access to your data already? Do just trust them when they say “we promise uwu” ?

            Also phones can be caught during shipping and modified, thats how the feds did it for one of their more recent big drug operations. Under Trump who fucking knows what justifications will be used to do the most vile shit.

            • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              12 days ago

              Updates aren’t forced. You have the ability to enable automatic updates, but they are turned off by default. They also cannot affect user data. iOS and app software is sandboxed. The kernel keeps application and OS layers independent, just like Linux. User data is stored in a separate partition.

              Apple users will experience the same thing that all other computer owners experience when they disable updates entirely; outdated security software and limited compatibility.

              • unexposedhazard
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                12 days ago

                Brother in christ, how hard is this to understand.

                Updates aren’t forced

                How do you know? Have you checked the code that runs the updates? Just because the phone usually gives you the option to postpone regular updates doesnt mean that they cant be forced.

                They also cannot affect user data.

                What makes you believe that? Did you write the software that keeps it sandboxed?

                Do people just believe anything that companies claim? If we could believe the things that companies claim, then the world would be a much nicer place but its not.

                If its not proven, then its not the case as far as anyone should be concerned. Do we believe in religion now because the pope says that god is real?

                And i havent even talked about code quality. Nobody can verify how well designed their software is. It could be a complete shitfest filled with old and insecure code that nobody does any auditing on.

              • moonpiedumplings@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                12 days ago

                Updates aren’t forced.

                No. Apple claims updates aren’t forced. With proprietary software, we have no way to verify if they have some way of forcing an update through.

                You have the ability to enable automatic updates, but they are turned off by default.

                No. Apple claims that only the user can enable automatic updates. With proprietary software, we have no way to verify if Apple can enable them remotely.

                Also, are you really going tell users to not update?

                They also cannot affect user data. iOS and app software is sandboxed. The kernel keeps application and OS layers independent, just like Linux.

                No. Apple claims that updates cannot affect user data. Again, with proprietary software, there is no way to truly verify.

                Apple users will experience the same thing that all other computer owners experience when they disable updates entirely; outdated security software and limited compatibility.

                Oh…so updates are good now, and we should update, even if it puts us at risk of something malicious?

                You are taking Apple’s claims as truth and pretending they are good. They probably aren’t.

                But, as someone else mentioned in the thread: The US government can force companies to spy for them. Even if Apple was as good as they market themselves to be, they cannot outrun the government.

                Now, it’s not realistic to force everybody to switch away from iPhones. But, we should stop treating proprietary software as truly trustworthy with our data.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 days ago

        “If you are paying, it doesn’t mean you are not the product”

        - Cory Doctorow

      • sus@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        Realistically, why would Apple blow up a $3.3T global success for an extra $10M? That 1/330 of the company value

        Because they know that even after being caught harvesting user data for advertising, people will still claim they don’t do that even on a specialist privacy community on lemmy. Now think just how long it will take for the average apple user to realize it

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          Yes. There was an issue with iOS 14.1 that enabled personalized ads by default if you didn’t restore from a backup. I was working for Apple at that time. It wasn’t intentional or malicious, and a hotfix was implemented as soon as the bug was identified. The lawsuit was just. Apple fucked up.