I mean, I see “leaked” videos of protests in authoritarian countries like China and just wonder why they dont just like make a backdoor that disables videos from being recorded. Or use some sort of 0-day exploit that installs malware on their phones and disable cameras.

I mean, I can’t be the only one that thought of it, right? Surely someone in the government would’ve thought of it.

Wonder why such tactic isn’t being used.

  • schnurrito
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    I mean you’re kinda getting into “Stallman was right” territory here. Obviously computers (including smartphones) should not be disabling any functionality without the owner’s consent, but we do not live in a free software utopia.

    How would that backdoor be activated? If over the Internet, it can be trivially avoided by not connecting the phone to the Internet.

    And in the end someone is going to bring a standalone camera that can’t even be connected to the Internet.

      • schnurrito
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Fair point, but it still wouldn’t stop standalone compact or interchangeable lens cameras or camcorders, those don’t even have a cell modem built in. Most people don’t carry one of these around, so it would reduce the number of cameras, but not to zero. People carrying cameras around wherever they go is a recent phenomenon anyway, it would take us back to around 2000.