• jol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The problem is most houses are being bought by huge companies, not people.

    • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      We should really start by limiting that. If we start treating housing as a basic right, which we should, there’s zero reason a company should be allowed to own housing to profit off of. It’s a far bigger problem than my landlady who owns five flats. We can talk about limits for people like her later.

      • jol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        39 minutes ago

        For sure. But we don’t even consider water a basic right and concede unlimited water rights to mega corporations before reserving water access to the local population. So I have no hope for that to happen with housing…

    • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      So limit those, too. A company can only own X properties. Above Y number of properties owned, Z% of them must be income-based. Go after any company getting around this with shell companies and shit. It’s a solvable problem, no one wants to tell the fat cats no though.