I believe that knowledge should be free, you should have access to knowledge even if you don’t have the money to afford buying it. This uses IPFS.

  • TheMachineStopsOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Just looked up Veilid seems to similar to I2P, but it is still in development and can’t be used for now. Also I agree that IPFS is horrible and not just the setup, the developer themselves are against piracy. What is the point of a decentralised network that picks and chooses what it hosts? BitTorrent, Tor, Freenet, and I2P never did this as far as I know.

    DCMA Denylist https://github.com/ipfs-inactive/faq/issues/36#issuecomment-140567411

    • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I think you’re all making look a bit worse than it is. I downloaded a few PDFs via IPFS and it worked for me. And I was happy it provided me with what I needed at that time. I can’t comment on reliability or other nuances. It also was slow in my case, but I took that as the usual trade-off. Usually, you either get speed or anonymity, not both. And there are valid use-cases for denylists. For example viruses, malware, CSAM and spam. I’d rather not have my node spread those. It’s complicated. And I also talk in public like that. I think what matters is what you do and implement, not if you say you comply with regulation and the DMCA…

      Thanks for the links, I’ll have a look.

      • TheMachineStopsOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        What are talking about, IPFS isn’t anonymity network, it is similar to torrenting everyone can see your ip.