Buy software, once Say goodbye to subscription fatigue! Discover software you can buy once and own forever–no recurring charges, just tools that work for you, for life.

  • tias
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The IntelliJ products are not exactly “buy once” - if you want updated versions you need to keep paying periodically.

    Not that I think that’s a bad thing necessarily - it doesn’t make sense to expect devs to continue working on something year after year when you’re not paying them for it.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      if you want updated versions you need to keep paying periodically.

      But you can continue using the older version, yes?

      • tias
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Sure, as long as it works. Software has a tendency to stop working on newer OS:es or become subject to security exploits though.

    • nectar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 days ago

      They are “buy once” in that their licenses include perpetual fallback. Whenever you stop paying, you retain your licenses perpetually

      • kameecoding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Not whenever, you need to be paying for a year and then then the latest version from a year ago is what you get the perpetual license for

    • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I’m happy to pay for software, but I want more than just permission, I want long term security that my investment in the tool will last.

      If IntelliJ would open source their oldest versions, I would make my boss buy me a copy of the newest version every year.

      • tias
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        That sounds good on paper, but the chances that someone else will pick up the ball if they abandon it, even if it’s open source, are very slim. If you care about keeping it alive then paying them is a more effective strategy than hoping for random volunteer work by internet strangers.

        You, on the other hand, have good chances of being able to learn new tools. So I think the need for this security is exaggerated.

        • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m a developer, so my chances are pretty good. But I take your point.

          Even if I weren’t, there’s enough software options out there that I don’t have to pick between paying for proprietary software and living with abandonware.

          So I think the need for this security is exaggerated.

          Of course. I used proprietary software for a long time. Having things I relied on get abandoned got old, but it worked.

          I just expect more from most of my software, now.