theres a lot of inconsistencies and details that an actual artist wouldn’t do, especially on her clothes. you can see the strings on her skirt and her necklace kinda fade in and out of existence. but the biggest giveaway is definitely the flag she’s holding.
Puppycat appears to mean through another comment that the symbols being distorted, or at least different from each other, are signs of a generated image. Having some experience with doodling myself, even if very sporadically, I think such a small detail is a major PITA to make perfect, so it feels pretty human-like to me.
um… i feel like the flag is pretty self explanatory?? thats a pretty perfect textbook example of what to look for, unless the artist very very deliberately wanted their art style to look ai generated. which they have done an insanely good job at doing if so.
Dunno what is your expected level of alleged human-like quality, but taking myself as example, when I want to doodle something and a detail is overly small or unecessarily hard to do, unless I copy-paste the given detail through software, I just go the simplified route. So to me, it looks very like it’s human-made.
What makes you think this is AI? Because i dont think it is.
theres a lot of inconsistencies and details that an actual artist wouldn’t do, especially on her clothes. you can see the strings on her skirt and her necklace kinda fade in and out of existence. but the biggest giveaway is definitely the flag she’s holding.
Taking as comparison the fingers, maybe rhe art style of the artist is simply crude? Also what about the flag?
the flag is the same as in the photo, they’re just making shit up.
Puppycat appears to mean through another comment that the symbols being distorted, or at least different from each other, are signs of a generated image. Having some experience with doodling myself, even if very sporadically, I think such a small detail is a major PITA to make perfect, so it feels pretty human-like to me.
um… i feel like the flag is pretty self explanatory?? thats a pretty perfect textbook example of what to look for, unless the artist very very deliberately wanted their art style to look ai generated. which they have done an insanely good job at doing if so.
Dunno what is your expected level of alleged human-like quality, but taking myself as example, when I want to doodle something and a detail is overly small or unecessarily hard to do, unless I copy-paste the given detail through software, I just go the simplified route. So to me, it looks very like it’s human-made.
Look like someone with bad drawing skills.
she’s literally holding the same flag in the actual photo, you knob.
we’ve reached the point where amateur know-it-alls are just calling art they don’t like AI.