@sgtnasty@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish • 9 months agoMy holy trinity of trustlemmy.mlimagemessage-square97fedilinkarrow-up1367arrow-down127file-text
arrow-up1340arrow-down1imageMy holy trinity of trustlemmy.ml@sgtnasty@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish • 9 months agomessage-square97fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareGVascolink6•9 months agoI might swap bitwarden by passbolt as it uses a more recent programming stack, although vaultwarden looks to be a good alternative too.
minus-squarefox [comrade/them]linkfedilinkEnglish3•9 months agoDoes a more recent stack translate to any real benefits?
minus-square@apt_install_coffee@lemmy.mllinkfedilink2•9 months agoNot necessarily, plenty of good programs written in C89 for example. With something that is heavily library dependent, having a more recent development stack may mean better maintained libraries but definitely not a sure thing.
I might swap bitwarden by passbolt as it uses a more recent programming stack, although vaultwarden looks to be a good alternative too.
Does a more recent stack translate to any real benefits?
Not necessarily, plenty of good programs written in C89 for example.
With something that is heavily library dependent, having a more recent development stack may mean better maintained libraries but definitely not a sure thing.
No love for KeePass?