Copyright holders hire services that use bots to monitor file-sharing networks and send ISPs millions of notices a year alleging infringement by someone at a particular IP address, Cox told the Supreme Court. Cox said that ISPs “have no way of verifying whether a bot-generated notice is accurate” and that even if the notices are accurate, terminating an account would punish every user in a household where only one person may have illegally downloaded copyrighted files.

  • Tolookah
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Time to have an AI shut down Sony’s Internet? Maybe all the concurring judges?

    • Chris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The only reason I think this won’t pass is AI needs to steal copy written data. If there wasn’t a corporate shithead doing it then I’m sure the Supreme Court would allow this

      • SolacefromSilence@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        You see, the corporate shithead will just share a gratuity with a few justices of choice. That’s how this court has been running for years.