nutbutter to vegan@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoIngredients be like... "Vegetarian, but not vegan"imagemessage-square89linkfedilinkarrow-up1521arrow-down114
arrow-up1507arrow-down1imageIngredients be like... "Vegetarian, but not vegan"nutbutter to vegan@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square89linkfedilink
minus-squarenutbutterOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·2 months agohttps://nutritionfacts.org/video/prostate-cancer-and-organic-milk-vs-almond-milk/ https://nutritionfacts.org/video/dairy-and-cancer/ https://nutritionfacts.org/video/the-effects-of-hormones-in-dairy-milk-on-cancer/ https://nutritionfacts.org/video/bovine-leukemia-virus-as-a-cause-of-breast-cancer/
minus-squaregwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 months agoI’d rather trust a CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE than some random-ass conspiracy blog that sells supplements Especially not a conspiracy blog that’s got no peer-reviewed sources.
minus-squareحمید پیام عباسی@crazypeople.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·2 months agoNutrition facts doesn’t sell or recommend any supplements. They do source all their articles. You didn’t even click the link
minus-squaregwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoThere’s a billion adverts on it, and the second I entered the page it asked me to subscribe to some shite
minus-squareحمید پیام عباسی@crazypeople.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·2 months agoNo there aren’t. It might ask you to subscribe to a newsletter but I don’t see that and I turned off ad block. Also the studies are peer reviewed, unless you don’t believe https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3249408 is peer reviewed. You probably have adware on your local browser.
minus-squaregwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoI don’t mean adverts on that sense, but rather that the articles are all trying to sell shit to me
minus-squarenutbutterOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 months agoResearch papers are cited under the sources section.
minus-squaregwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·2 months agoNone of which peer reviewed, none of which newer than 2011. That’s funny as fuck.
minus-squareحمید پیام عباسی@crazypeople.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·2 months agoYou’re full of shit
https://nutritionfacts.org/video/prostate-cancer-and-organic-milk-vs-almond-milk/
https://nutritionfacts.org/video/dairy-and-cancer/
https://nutritionfacts.org/video/the-effects-of-hormones-in-dairy-milk-on-cancer/
https://nutritionfacts.org/video/bovine-leukemia-virus-as-a-cause-of-breast-cancer/
I’d rather trust a CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE than some random-ass conspiracy blog that sells supplements
Especially not a conspiracy blog that’s got no peer-reviewed sources.
Nutrition facts doesn’t sell or recommend any supplements. They do source all their articles. You didn’t even click the link
There’s a billion adverts on it, and the second I entered the page it asked me to subscribe to some shite
No there aren’t. It might ask you to subscribe to a newsletter but I don’t see that and I turned off ad block. Also the studies are peer reviewed, unless you don’t believe https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3249408 is peer reviewed.
You probably have adware on your local browser.
I don’t mean adverts on that sense, but rather that the articles are all trying to sell shit to me
Research papers are cited under the sources section.
None of which peer reviewed, none of which newer than 2011.
That’s funny as fuck.
You’re full of shit