That makes more sense, I somehow skipped the sentence (in the image) mentioning the high rate.

I was a bit mislead by the claim this study couldn’t be done in the US/Denmark because of medical ethics. More like it would have been unethical and not approved were the infection rate equally as high. If the point is only seeing whether there are neurodevelopmental disabilities associated with administering the vaccine right after birth then obviously Guinea-Bisset would be the very last choice.

Thanks for pointing this out though!