Being natural yet more is generally better even for our health. Some might say eating meat is natural for us, I have heard such talk, but our physiology says something else. We do not have claws and teeth for it, we would not just catch animals and eat them. Cooking is not as natural. Predators in nature do not cook. Veganism is the only right choice. There is the healthiest way possible with being vegan, with enough whole foods. Any animal agriculture and industry using the animals involve suffering of animals and the slaughter of them. We should not think there is more reason to not be vegan. The best we can do is learn from our mistakes and make our choices besides what is routine more carefully with our observation, any can make such a commitment as I make that anyone who I eat with, which is now very rare for me, will know I am vegan and what that means, that I would not knowingly eat anything with animal products.
Appeal to nature is not a solid argument for- nor against veganism. Cooking unlocks vastly more calories. This is all very much anti-science and not welcome here.
The China Study, besides many more studies, Forks Over Knives, https://www.forksoverknives.com/, there was nothing in my communication against cooking, it was pointing out we and any people are not natural predators, which do not need cooking. Uncooked vegetables and fruits are available to us, any meat that would be desired is necessarily cooked, unlike what natural predators would eat. I made my point, with studies backing up what is healthiest.
China study… you don’t have to continue bro. Their studies are skewed, due to food shortages and much more limited food variety.
You don’t know what you’re talking about, and your comment sounds racist. Oxford University and Cornell University were also principally involved:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China–Cornell–Oxford_Project
Racist? What the fuck are you talking about? I CLEARLY explained why the study is bogus. Learn to read and stop being ignorant by using labels you have no fucking idea about what they mean.
Damn dude, you raise an impressive “please block me, your Lemmy experience will only be enhanced” argument.
That is “CLEARLY explained why the study is bogus”? Get real. You revealed you don’t even know who’s behind the study. So, you demonstrate little evidence of providing valid insight and not ignorant, poorly-informed speculation. And you’re rude.
May we enjoy our separate Lemmy experiences henceforth
Cool story bro. If you want to be an online buffoon and argue, instead of just ignoring people you dont agree with, go to Reddit. Also, blocked.