• SkaveRat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    how so?

    The technology to use fusion as a bomb already exists. and has 0 to do with how the reactors work

    • atcorebcor@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      For example when Russia invaded Ukraine and they attacked Chernobyl. Maybe it’s not founded in real risk. But I imagine it could be a security threat for someone to bomb a nuclear facility.

      • Techlos@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        To alleviate your concerns - unlike fission, in a fusion reactor the only radiation comes from the active fusion process, and chamber lining that’s been bombarded by radiation. The worst case is a brief spike of neutron and gamma radiation from where the chamber breaches before the plasma collapses, a small amount of short-lived radioisotopes from the chamber debris, and a bit of tritium.

        The radiation from the debris would be at background levels in a year or two, since there’s no transuranic decay chains (once decay event, and it’s stable again). The tritium would disperse to background levels in minutes, and the radiation burst would only be a hazard in the immediate vicinity.

        Not free from issues at all, but compared to a fission reactor the worst-case scenario isn’t bad at all.

        • atcorebcor@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Great, and I also hear that the amount of nuclear waste is tiny in comparison to contemporary nuclear reactors.

      • SkaveRat
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        A fusion power plant will not explode in any meaningful way