Flying Squid@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · vor 2 JahrenMicrosoft Needs So Much Power to Train AI That It's Considering Small Nuclear Reactorsfuturism.comexternal-linkmessage-square408linkfedilinkarrow-up11.16Karrow-down130cross-posted to: tech@kbin.social
arrow-up11.13Karrow-down1external-linkMicrosoft Needs So Much Power to Train AI That It's Considering Small Nuclear Reactorsfuturism.comFlying Squid@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · vor 2 Jahrenmessage-square408linkfedilinkcross-posted to: tech@kbin.social
minus-squareNobsi@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20arrow-down8·vor 2 Jahrenhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_of_electricity_by_source#Capital_costs No, it isnt. Safety isnt what makes nuclear expensive. You actually got rawdogged by Nuclear fanatics.
minus-squareChris@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·vor 2 JahrenDamn. Sucks to still see Natural Gas as the cheapest. I think that modern nuclear designs have a place in decarbonization but I don’t think it is cheaper and we have a lot of hurdles still.
minus-squareNatanael@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·vor 2 JahrenWind power at shores is generally cheapest
minus-squareNatanael@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·vor 2 JahrenCapital costs is incomplete, you need to look at lifetime costs versus lifetime production to get a more useful average - Levelized cost of energy (LCOE) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levelized_cost_of_electricity https://www.lazard.com/research-insights/2023-levelized-cost-of-energyplus/ https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/levelized-cost-of-energy https://www.iea.org/reports/projected-costs-of-generating-electricity-2020
minus-squareNatanael@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·vor 2 JahrenI see absolutely no relevance here
minus-squareNobsi@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·vor 2 JahrenLemmy is owned by genocide deniers. Whats your point?
minus-squareUFO@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·vor 2 JahrenYea this entire clickbait can be summarized as “company looks to spend less on high capacity power”
minus-squarenot_gsa@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down6·vor 2 JahrenRare lemming reasonable take
minus-squaremonobot@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·vor 2 JahrenAnd you just need to find good non science fiction way to deal with nuclear waste. And some ethical ways of aquiring uranium. With all that calculated in, I am certain how much cheaper it is.
deleted by creator
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_of_electricity_by_source#Capital_costs
No, it isnt.
Safety isnt what makes nuclear expensive. You actually got rawdogged by Nuclear fanatics.
Damn. Sucks to still see Natural Gas as the cheapest.
I think that modern nuclear designs have a place in decarbonization but I don’t think it is cheaper and we have a lot of hurdles still.
Wind power at shores is generally cheapest
Capital costs is incomplete, you need to look at lifetime costs versus lifetime production to get a more useful average - Levelized cost of energy (LCOE)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levelized_cost_of_electricity
https://www.lazard.com/research-insights/2023-levelized-cost-of-energyplus/
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/levelized-cost-of-energy
https://www.iea.org/reports/projected-costs-of-generating-electricity-2020
deleted by creator
I see absolutely no relevance here
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Lemmy is owned by genocide deniers. Whats your point?
Yea this entire clickbait can be summarized as “company looks to spend less on high capacity power”
Rare lemming reasonable take
And you just need to find good non science fiction way to deal with nuclear waste.
And some ethical ways of aquiring uranium.
With all that calculated in, I am certain how much cheaper it is.