• tias
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I feel like this is a solved and simple problem as long as there are no relativistic effects. Just make sure t1 and t2 are represented as seconds since a known reference time, e.g. Unix epoch, and make sure that measure is accurate. You don’t need to bring the Gregorian calendar into it, use TAI represented as an integer.

    • jol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Until you need to decide how many months are between t1 and t2, and then all answers are wrong.

      • tias
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        To do that you first need to choose a calendar and a time zone, then convert to that representation. It can be done, but you need a good implementation that understands the entire history of what has transpired w.r.t. to date conventions in that location and culture. For timestamps in the future it is impossible to do correctly, since you can’t know how date conventions will change in the future.

        However, I should add that as far as mathematical operations go, calculating the number of months between t1 and t2 is an entirely different thing than the duration of time that passed between those timestamps. Even if it is expressed similarly in the English language, semantically it’s something else. It’s like asking “how many kilometers did your car go” vs “how many houses did the car pass on the way”.