BrikoX@lemmy.zipM to Technology@lemmy.zipEnglish · 6 months agoVizio agrees to pay $3 million for alleged ‘false’ refresh rate claimswww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up187arrow-down11
arrow-up186arrow-down1external-linkVizio agrees to pay $3 million for alleged ‘false’ refresh rate claimswww.theverge.comBrikoX@lemmy.zipM to Technology@lemmy.zipEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square13fedilink
minus-squareColeSlothlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·6 months agoSo really it’s just the same thing with an extra step. They decide how much money it should cost the company, look of the companies profits, and give a percentage that matches the value they wanted.
minus-squareBrikoX@lemmy.zipOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-26 months agoEven at the lowest 1% fine of annual revenue would have been 17 million. So no, 3 million =/ 17 million. At maximum 6% it would have been 102 million.
So really it’s just the same thing with an extra step. They decide how much money it should cost the company, look of the companies profits, and give a percentage that matches the value they wanted.
Even at the lowest 1% fine of annual revenue would have been 17 million. So no, 3 million =/ 17 million. At maximum 6% it would have been 102 million.
There’s a max of only 6%