New cat is totally cool with OG cat. OG cat fucking hates the new cat.

I won’t my paper airplane competition several times in grade school. I was a G. It went way farther than a tightly balled up piece of paper.

As of about three weeks ago a stray cat figured out how to use our doggie door.

Now we have a 2nd cat.

Those look like shit pancakes with non shit toppings.

The article clearly states it was based off of a biopsy. There was a 2nd biopsy done several months later that shown negative and the doc said it was because the treatment was working. The article further states that “come to find out” the biopsy test for that disease has a high false positive rate.

Did you only skim the article, or not read it at all?

Holy shit. I gues lemmy is a pretty young place for you to say something so completely wrong and get so many upvotes for it. Most cars have been “unleaded gasoline only” since the mid to late 70"s.

Think about it. Do you think those cars from the 1990’s still on the road today have all had engine and fuel pump swaps on them to run unleaded? Heck no. Most all the cars you’re going to find from the 70’s, 80’s, and 90’s all still say “unleaded fuel only” by the gas gauge. Most gas stations in the 1980’s didn’t even offer leaded gasoline.

The article states he was seeing 70 patients a day. So my source is your posting.

I don’t think he did it purposefully. He sounds like an extreme narcissist and couldn’t comprehend being incorrect about an initial diagnosis.

This narcissist lived for being in that hospital. He was making so much because he was seeing SEVENTY patients a day. Not because he was salaried as a ceo.

So even if he pocketed $100 a patient average, 286 days at work a year would earn him $2,000,000.

After reading the entire article, it really just sounds like this guy saw himself as some sort of never wrong Dr.House type of jackass who thought the world should bow down at his feet. An egotistical narcissist.

I don’t think he screwed up people’s lives on purpose. He just had his head shoved too far up his own ass to notice.

Shiiiiit. You know those requests coming from someone like Musk.

The cgi looked kinda low budget for a big $ film in 2025 and it looked like there’s going to be so many villains that the audience won’t know who to dislike the most, but who knows. It’ll probably be more action than story.

If your dishes end up more spotty than with pods, it’s likely that you’re using more powder than you need to be, FYI.

Most people who don’t watch nerdy videos on the internet about dishwashers tend to use more powder than needed.

Yeah, but if you double a very small percentage, it’s still a very small percentage. That’s the part you don’t seem to grasp. So what if it’s “doubled” when the end result is still only 4%.

I’m not sure if you’re bad at math or just mad you’re wrong.

You were misreading.

What I brought up obviously doesn’t have all the details ironed out. Just a base concept. Add some money in for the 2nd home.

No rich people would be allowed to hold office in that party. That’d be the point.

https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/birth-control/withdrawal-pull-out-method/how-effective-is-withdrawal-method-pulling-out

https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/birth-control/condom/how-effective-are-condoms

Summary of the two links above is that when used perfectly, pull out method results in a 4% chance per year for pregnancy, and condoms result in a 2% chance per year for pregnancy. Real world usage (because people usually don’t do things correctly) is 22% per year chance with pull out, and 13% chance with condoms.

So if done correctly, pulling out is 2% more likely than condoms, and if not done correctly it’s 9% more likely than condoms.

You’d have to add a NSFW tab.

Twas the fleas.