JPDev@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · edit-210 months agoFitbit Clock Faceprogramming.devimagemessage-square135fedilinkarrow-up11.39Karrow-down126
arrow-up11.37Karrow-down1imageFitbit Clock Faceprogramming.devJPDev@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · edit-210 months agomessage-square135fedilink
minus-squareSwednecklinkfedilinkarrow-up13·10 months agohonestly just depends on what kind of watchface you want, square is cheaper and in some ways more convenient so if you don’t want an analog clockface there’s no reason to bother
minus-squareshea@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down11·10 months agoit’s ugly and sticks out too much when it’s square. round is classy
minus-squareipkpjersi@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up5·10 months agoTrue but it can also look sleek/modern, or at least rectangular can imo.
honestly just depends on what kind of watchface you want, square is cheaper and in some ways more convenient so if you don’t want an analog clockface there’s no reason to bother
it’s ugly and sticks out too much when it’s square. round is classy
True but it can also look sleek/modern, or at least rectangular can imo.