• isthereanyseal
    link
    02 months ago

    It is open source. But the license is not foss at the moment. They expresed their desire to make something that send revenue to creators

    • chebra
      link
      fedilink
      52 months ago

      @isthereanydeal therefore it’s not open source. See for something to be called “open source” it needs a bit more than just for the code to be readable. The only people who define open source as source readable are the people who don’t want to create open source software.

      • isthereanyseal
        link
        02 months ago

        There’s a clear difference between open source and free open source software. It is open source but the licence is not “free”. Not entirely at least

        • chebra
          link
          fedilink
          02 months ago

          @isthereanydeal Nope. That distinction only appeared when big companies kinda became afraid of open source software, so they wanted to redefine the term, create some confusion, corrupt it…

          • isthereanyseal
            link
            22 months ago

            You may have a point but there’s a difference anyway

            • chebra
              link
              fedilink
              02 months ago

              @heyoni I’m commenting from mastodon, I don’t even see any upvotes. Someone just started downvoting me because they ran out of arguments 🤷‍♂️

              • @heyoni@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                12 months ago

                That must be why. On lemmy, like reddit you automatically upvote your own comments. Yours was at 0 probably cause mastodon doesn’t do that.

      • @n0x0n@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        02 months ago

        Open source is when the source code is available.

        Free software is when the source is available and the license lets you exercise your 4 freedoms.

        • chebra
          link
          fedilink
          -12 months ago

          @n0x0n You are wrong though: https://opensource.org/osd

          > Introduction
          > Open source doesn’t just mean access to the source code.

          Literally the first sentence.

          The definition you are using is being spread by the likes of Meta and Amazon.

            • chebra
              link
              fedilink
              -12 months ago

              @n0x0n Providing an authoritative source which directly contradicts your statement, that does not make any sense to you? I’m sorry then.