Many voters say they donā€™t want a convicted felon in the White House. But do they mean it? And can prosecutors get to trial before the vote?

Can anything stop former President Donald Trumpā€™s reelection campaign juggernaut, now that Trump has all but crushed his GOP primary opponents and pulled ahead of President Joe Biden in national polls?

While November is a long time away, and plenty could happen before then, voters do say Trump has a massive weakness: A potential criminal conviction. In poll after poll, lots of voters who shrug off Trumpā€™s four indictments say they wouldnā€™t support him if heā€™s convicted of a felony. If they mean itā€”or even if a big chunk of them doā€”they could easily be enough to keep him out of the White House.

What remains to be seen, of course, is whether they mean itā€”and, crucially, whether prosecutors can put Trump on trial in time for the rest of us to find out.

That makes prosecutorsā€™ race against the clock one of the most important narratives of the 2024 election cycle, as teams of lawyers work feverishly around the country to overcome Trumpā€™s efforts to gum up the gears of the judicial system and push the start-date of all his trials past November.

  • HWK_290@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    Ā·
    9 months ago

    Iā€™d like to think that the mere fact that Trump is facing this absolute litany of charges would be enough to drive any reasonable people away in droves, but clearly that applies too much rational thought for many of my fellow countrymen

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      Ā·
      9 months ago

      Everyone who could be swayed has already been peeled away or never voted for him in the first place. All thatā€™s left are the people who would vote for literally any Republican and those who think God sent him.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      Ā·
      9 months ago

      Yeah, I really donā€™t understand this claim. Why would his being found guilty of things that everyone but his most die-hard supporters know heā€™s obviously guilty of change peopleā€™s votes?