Examples could be things like specific configuration defaults or general decision-making in leadership.

What would you change?

  • sebsch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    There where Times when Ubuntu was Marks baby, but nowadays with pro, advertisement and tracking in the terminal an AppStore, everything has to have a businesscase.

    I would recommend just plain Debian either with flatpak or in the testing branch. It’s almost the same, stable as a rock and driven by a community.

    • umbrella@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      if i understand correctly the testing branch is similar to ubuntu non-lts?

      • sebsch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Somewhat but it is a rolling release. Packages will be major-updated constantly.

          • sebsch
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yes it runs quite stable. But the packages and their configuration can change.

            If you’re looking for something more conservative, the stable branch fits better but on a desktop it’s very old (like an Ubuntu lts)

            • umbrella@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              thats precisely my problem with debian stable, but id be ok with testing if it doesnt break unpredictably with regular updates.

              • sebsch
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                On my side it’s running since years without problems. I would never use arch on a business workstation with debian testing I see no problems at all.