Thousands of authors demand payment from AI companies for use of copyrighted works::Thousands of published authors are requesting payment from tech companies for the use of their copyrighted works in training artificial intelligence tools, marking the latest intellectual property critique to target AI development.

  • joe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s not plagiarism if it says it’s her book, lol.

    What are your feelings on public libraries? And does it spit out the entire book, or just excerpts?

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I don’t think you understand what plagiarism is. When you profit off of someone else’s work, you’re plagiarizing. Libraries do not profit off of anything. OpenAI, however, is a for-profit endeavor.

      • joe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        plagiarizing

        This is taking someone’s work and passing it off as your own. Did you not do a simple google search when there was some doubt to the definition, like I just did?

          • joe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Did you read that?

            Plagiarism can happen intentionally or unintentionally when a person uses another person’s ideas or words without citing the original source. Here are four common forms of plagiarism:

            • Copying another person’s words without using quotation marks or referencing the original source
            • Copying an author’s words without using quotation marks but using accurate footnotes to the original source
            • Paraphrasing an author’s ideas without including a reference to the original source
            • Rearranging an author’s exact words, even if there is a footnote to the original source

            Oh no, I plagiarized! lol

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Copying another person’s words without using quotation marks or referencing the original source

              ChatGPT can do that.

              Copying an author’s words without using quotation marks but using accurate footnotes to the original source

              ChatGPT can do that.

              Paraphrasing an author’s ideas without including a reference to the original source

              ChatGPT can do that.

              Rearranging an author’s exact words, even if there is a footnote to the original source

              ChatGPT can do that.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Yes, can. It is capable of doing all those things and, again, if she is correct, will do so if prompted.

                  • joe@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    I think this is nonsense, but you’re saying the issue is that it doesn’t use quotes when someone asks it to quote a passage from her book? Is that true?