• scoobford@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    I agree, old homes have hella survivorship bias. But, you are playing roulette that nothing with fail immediately. The advantage of new construction is that you don’t have to worrru about any stupid retrofits and that you know nothing will break for at least a little bit.

    • Clasm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Or worry about all of the asbestos, lead, and formaldehyde -laced building materials that were all of the rage in previous decades.

      • shottymcb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think Formaldehyde is a bigger problem in new construction than old. Asbestos and lead are harder to deal with though. Formaldehyde just needs ventilation and a few years of offgassing.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      nothing will break for at least a little bit.

      Has not been my experience. Yea the builder will usually fix it but I’ve seen them try to weasel out of that too.