As a medical doctor I extensively use digital voice recorders to document my work. My secretary does the transcription. As a cost saving measure the process is soon intended to be replaced by AI-powered transcription, trained on each doctor’s voice. As I understand it the model created is not being stored locally and I have no control over it what so ever.

I see many dangers as the data model is trained on biometric data and possibly could be used to recreate my voice. Of course I understand that there probably are other recordings on the Internet of me, enough to recreate my voice, but that’s beside the point. Also the question is about educating them, not a legal one.

How do I present my case? I’m not willing to use a non local AI transcribing my voice. I don’t want to be percieved as a paranoid nut case. Preferravly I want my bosses and collegues to understand the privacy concerns and dangers of using a “cloud sollution”. Unfortunately thay are totally ignorant to the field of technology and the explanation/examples need to translate to the lay person.

  • Norgur@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    Okay, so two questions:

    1. are you in a country that falls under the GDPR?
    2. this training data is to be per person?
    • FlappyBubble@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 months ago

      I work in Sweden and it falls under GDPR. There probably are GDPR implications but as I wrote the question is not legal. I want my bosses to be aeare of the general issue ad this is but the first of many similar problems.

      The training data is to be per person, resulting in a tailored model to every single doctor.

      • Norgur@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        I think you can use the gdpr for your advantage here. Someone has to have tried this, right? So they could put on a gdpr request, demanding all data stored from them.