• Yondu_the_Ravager@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah they’d fill should’ve upgraded the processor for the OLED switch, and I totally agree about the joycon situation. I was more talking about the screen, Nintendo easily could’ve made the first Gen switch OLED but they didn’t.

    • hoodatninja@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I feel the price was already a little high at launch (since they are adamant about making a profit on hardware as opposed to Sony/Microsoft who sell at a loss) so the addition of a more expensive screen would’ve probably pushed the price too high tbh. It was 2017, OLED’s were still pretty new and very expensive.

    • mindbleach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      LCD was fine. Locked 60 Hz refresh rate made no sense whatsoever. Even shitty laptops can dip down to 40 Hz, and that’d make dodgy framerates less stuttery. But the Switch is Nvidia hardware. There’s no excuse to not at least support 120 Hz polling to flip framebuffers.