• agarorn@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Together, the five BRICS members represent more than 40% of the global population, and their share of the world economy (when measured in purchasing power parity) is larger than that of the G7.

    I wasn’t aware of that so far. BRICS is massive.

    • BuckShot@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The coverage on BRICS is heavily dependent on where you live. If your in the US or an allied country, it’s best to keep it quite I’d think

  • Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I doubt all of these countries are going to be willing to give up their own sovereign currency to make this joint currency useful enough.

    • Tretiak@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Except that’s not the framing they view the issue in. They see it as preferable to remaining financially kept on the hook and leash of the US, only to have their chain jerked and be threatened whenever they ‘act out of line’.

    • frippa@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They aren’t, it’s just a reserve currency, just like the EU has the euro but uses the dollar as their primary reserve currency, or maybe a country with monetary sovrainty like japan etc is a better example, this brics currency is just a reserve one

    • jmcs
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They can have something like the ECU (the predecessor of the Euro), which was a non-circulating currency. There would still be significant challenges to achieving it but at least it doesn’t sound outright impossible.

  • seirim@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Skeptical of China and India getting along well enough to collaborate on a real currency.

    • jmcs
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And both Brazil and India like to play both sides when it involves the west - or as they would say, they like to be non-aligned which is functionally the same thing.

      • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You may be thinking Brasil under Bolsonaro and Brasil under Lula are the same thing, look at the news since Lula came to power. Bolsonaro is the one who did the kind of stuff you mentioned because he saw the West is crumbling and stayed at whichever side it was more beneficial for him, but Lula is other story.

        • jmcs
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lula signed an agreement with Portugal to make fighter jets for NATO just a few weeks ago while still going to BRICS meetings. If that’s not playing both sides…