But .ml was telling us that Trump would stop the genocide not supercharge it. How can this be? /s

It’s almost like they use elite globalist to mean something that if they said out loud would end up with them in jail for hate speech. /S

In a “broken clock is right twice a day but clock running backwards is right 4 times a time a day” kind of way, financial institutions seem to be mostly ignoring them. I don’t know if being just evil instead of evil and stupid is much of an improvement, but there’s that.

Native Americans should deport the colonists. Preferably to Antarctica.

The AfD says they are making an house shape - the woman is even using her left arm. It’s bullshit of course, but they thrive on following the letter of the law while pooping all over what it stands for.

That if you call Lukashenko Europe’s last dictator you are forgetting the other one.

Europe’s last dictator

Last I checked Europe ends in the Urals.

You are forgetting that Russia and the US already have territorial conflicts in the Artic, because both claim most of the sea for themselves, and that neither country wants the oil reserves in the hands of the other.

If Trump controlled Canada and Greenland it would bolster the US claim and make it viable for the US to enforce it.

As for China, they benefit from a trade route being divided between several countries, as it’s more likely that the international community will end up pressuring Canada to accept an international strait regime if the entire sea is not in the hands of the US.

And after 3 years of negotiations and Ukraine being probably the fastest country to adapt their laws in the history of enlargements they are still nowhere near close to be aligned with the EU on internal market rules.

He can try, but that would be an attack on the rest of NATO and it would definitely grab the attention of Russia and China that don’t want the US monopolizing the Arctic. And there’s nothing that puts all existing grievances on pause like a nazi lunatic doing land grabs.

You know when can we provide enough food, clothing, shelter, and healthcare for everyone? Now. That argument has not been valid for decades.

That’s immaterial to the fundamental right to have access to basic needs.

Most and all are different things.

Unfortunately this mindset is so common that even most “Marxist” movements have corrupted the “to which according to his needs” to “which according to his work/contributions”.

The problem with slowly is that a Canadian membership is being discussed as an answer to Trump threat to torpedo the western economy during this year. It would be more productive to focus on what trade agreements can be done in that timeframe instead of focusing on a goal that would take decades.

It’s not about selling electricity, it’s about having a single market for electrical devices. There’s no single market if most products don’t work in one country. Even different AC plugs are only allowed because adapters are cheap and using different plugs for Ireland and Italy is a minor change in the production line.

I didn’t even think about that one as an effective barrier to trade. That would be a shit show of epic proportions. The most realistic solution would be to make all products dual voltage to protect the single market, either directly or through a transformer in their power cable, but that would increase costs for everyone.

When your economy is geared to exporting mostly to a country that will not accept products made according to the new rules it is.

This would be a nightmare for Canada. Their regulations are all aligned with the US. Products would need to be adjusted, processes would need to be changed, entire product stocks would need to be offloaded. And it would make lots of Canadian products unexportable to the US.

Even something as simple as eggs have incompatible regulations in Europe and North America.

deleted by creator