• @phorq@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    53 months ago

    While I still hate ISPs, yeah that original verdict was nonsense. Them providing internet does not make them complicit in the piracy that the internet is used for even if they get paid. It’s not like they’re offering a piracy plan.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    23 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    A federal appeals court today overturned a $1 billion piracy verdict that a jury handed down against cable Internet service provider Cox Communications in 2019.

    If the correct legal standard had been used in the district court, “no reasonable jury could find that Cox received a direct financial benefit from its subscribers’ infringement of Plaintiffs’ copyrights,” judges wrote.

    The case began when Sony and other music copyright holders sued Cox, claiming that it didn’t adequately fight piracy on its network and failed to terminate repeat infringers.

    Cox’s appeal was supported by advocacy groups concerned that the big-money judgment could force ISPs to disconnect more Internet users based merely on accusations of copyright infringement.

    If not overturned, this decision will lead to an untold number of people losing vital Internet access as ISPs start to cut off more and more customers to avoid massive damages."

    In today’s 4th Circuit ruling, appeals court judges wrote that “Sony failed, as a matter of law, to prove that Cox profits directly from its subscribers’ copyright infringement.”


    The original article contains 543 words, the summary contains 172 words. Saved 68%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!