• J Lou@mastodon.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    It depends on how the misinformation relates to the act. There can be cases where such an act is intentional

    That sounds like a conspiracy. There are cases where the DFR party isn’t imputed legal responsibility because there isn’t enough evidence to determine who is DFR. It means we don’t know not that there isn’t a fact of the matter.

    Natural resources are not fruits of labor. They should be socially owned. Each worker coop DFR for greenhouse gases would be liable to society