As aliases

alias g-log="git log --graph --format='format:%C(yellow)%h%C(reset) %s %C(magenta)%cr%C(reset)%C(auto)%d%C(reset)'"
alias g-history='gitk --all &'
alias g-checkout='git checkout $(git branch --sort=-committerdate --no-merged | fzf)'
alias g-commit='git citool &'
alias g-amend='git citool --amend &'
alias g-rebase='git rebase --interactive --autosquash'
alias g-pull='git pull --verbose --rebase'
alias g-pushf='git push --verbose --force-with-lease'
alias g-status='git status --ignored'
alias g-clean='git clean -fdx && git reset --hard && git submodule foreach --recursive git clean -fdx && git submodule foreach --recursive git reset --hard'
  • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I disagree wholeheartedly with this. I consider the commit history as documentation for pull requests and for future history, and as such I make liberal use of interactive rebasing to curate my commits.

    Rebasing in general is one of those things that I picked up fairly late, but now it’s essential to my git workflow.

    • TechNom (nobody)@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      What’s ironic is that rebases aren’t as hard as many consider it to be. Once you’ve done it a couple of times, you just do it everyday as easily as you commit changes.

      • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Absolutely. I think it helps a lot to understand the mechanics of git and rebasing, but after a few times it just makes more sense than merging, really.