• tsonfeir@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Japan has no lithium to mine. So hydrogen is the best option for them. While I understand this for Japan, there’s a big world out there where Toyota is a market leader… for now.

    • You999@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      You are also missing the fact the Japan’s power grid is in a desperate need of repairs and improvements. Hydrogen won’t fix however it introduces some lower cost temporary fixes that can be quickly implemented. In the long term the correct solution would be to fix the grid but we both know if there’s a cheaper and easier solution what they’ll go with…

    • vrighter
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      but there is no hydrogen to mine either. Hydrogen is made from fossil fuels too (most of it)

      • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Yes, steam methane reforming is the most cost effective. But there are other ways to make it. The most eco friendly was is electrolysis that uses electricity to split water into hydrogen and oxygen. There are some microorganisms, such as algae and bacteria, that can produce hydrogen through biological reactions—but those aren’t able to scale today.

      • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        Important thing is there are multiple ways to produce hydrogen. Cheapest is through methane, but that’s only because methane itself is cheap. There are other methods of producing hydrogen and the more demand there is for it, the cheaper it’ll get. Especially when you consider there won’t OPEC to mess around with prices by rigging production against demand. So it would be smart to focus on fuel source which can be easily produced anywhere and can provide similar performance like current ICEs.

        • vrighter
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          yeah, but we urgently need that huge amount of renewable energy elsewhere.

    • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Lithium to my knowledge is not as abundant and very hard to recycle. There are a lot of chemical waste in all processes.

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        It wasn’t very abundant 10 years ago. More deposits have been found, refining and extracting technology has improved and hopefully we will see the first commercial mass produced sodium-based battery this year (not in 25 years like fusion).

        Lithium nickel cobalt batteries are still the best for density per kg, but will be reserved for premium cars in the future.