• FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    9 months ago

    First off, it needs to be noted that the only mechanism to do that on so large a scale is to increase the minimum wage.

    Which is how they did it in ‘38 when the work week went to 44, and in ‘40 when it when to what it is today.

    The problem is that company are absolutely going to pass that off to customers (aka, the workers… ultimately.) and so really all you’ve done, effectively, is put far more people onto minimum wage.

    Anyone who was above that mimimim? Gets the shaft.

    And people who now are on minimum? Working two jobs to pay for everything (like most people in the bottom quarter are already doing anyhow,) so they don’t really see reduced hours anyway.

    It’s well meaning and it’d be nice, but it needs to be done differently. Unions are strong now. Stronger than they have been since I’ve been working. Join a union. Make the change yourself; eventually it’ll get normalized without the above problems. (Also, better wages, healthcare, workplace safety and everything else Unions get you.)(don’t tell my boss’s boss that. He’s still buthurt from negotiating a new contract.)

    • hardaysknight@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      The problem is that company are absolutely going to pass that off to customers (aka, the workers… ultimately.)

      News flash, they’re going to be raising prices regardless.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        9 months ago

        And they won’t tack that on, too, anyhow?

        Chances are they’ll pass on the costs, increase the price, anyhow, shrink products, and raise prices even more, and then blame the last three on the first.

        Exactly like they’ve been doing.

          • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            20
            ·
            9 months ago

            You’re the one bringing it into consideration…

            So… why are you bringing it up?

              • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                I said they will pass the cost on to customers.

                You they said they would raise prices anyhow.

                I said (snarkishly) that raising rates is a separate thing than the cost of wages, and they’d still do it.

                So you they said the point is they’re a still going to do the price increase.

                You’rethey’re one that brought up the (totally separate) price increase.

                (Edit, confused you for the other guy)