• Madison420@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sure, that’s a different claim though. This person claims riots to have already occurred because of it, to wit - where?

    • ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That other person argued that the riots already occurred and you falsely dismissed them. It was my position that he’s going to call for riots whether his property gets seized or not, and I’ll add that he can’t do it as effectively if he’s in a 6x10 cell without any of his personal possessions with him.

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        He might call for them, he does for everything. The difference being people will go to the auction to buy his shit, can’t do that at a riot and say for instance it does turn to a riot or would be at his property and they would be stealing his shit. To wit - have at why even wait for the auction, that fucks kids got over 2billion while he was in office so take it back if you feel like it.