• PrefersAwkward@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    9 months ago

    I think the question is: if a person is going to make such a tiny swap, why even use swap?

    Such a small swap is unlikely to save a system from memory problems and it’s does not seem likely to make a noticeable difference in performance when it’s only able to swap out small amounts of memory.

    Why wouldn’t one just put in larger ZRAM or a larger Swap with a reduced swapiness?

    If I have a raspberry pi with 1 GB ram, I don’t think a 2 MB swap is worth bothering with.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 months ago

      Swap is not intended to save a system from memory problems. And absolutely not fit for that purpose.

      And if you are using that memory, it will make a noticeable difference in performance.

      But for it to have any impact at all, you need the default (high) swapiness. If you reduce it, that partition will become useless.

      Anyway, I don’t recommend you put any swap at your PI’s SD card.

      • PrefersAwkward@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        I wouldn’t put swap on an SD card, no. Even if it had an NVME, it seems like putting up at least a double-digit percent would be more effective than 1%.

        Also, since 6.1, swap has been a lot better, with MGLRU. ChromeOS gets away with paltry amounts of RAM due to swapping. So classic overcommitting seems fine as long as you don’t run into situations where more RAM is active at once than is available by hardware.

        • marcos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          4 GB are 4 GB, it doesn’t matter how much memory you have at total.

          The only usage of swap where you should even look at your RAM size is for on-disk sleeping. And most people don’t do this anymore.