Feel free to elaborate on the topic!

  • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    I heard the opposite. I thought he won the case because the kid failed to properly describe MJs penis

    • Devi@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Jordan Chandler, who wasn’t the kid from the 2000 case, drew the pattern of pale patches around MJs genitalia, the police then took pictures to compare. Both were ruled inadmissable in court and that whole case was settled out of court with Michael giving him a lot of money.

      I don’t believe they ever confirmed or denied whether he was right.