I am also very confused at what your point is. Like, they mentioned that bible stories were indeed second hand, if not more.

If you mean their childhood story, that was first hand.

If you are referring to priests delivering an incorrect interpretation of the Bible, it’s implied they grew up in a religious environment and read the Bible, couldn’t find the answers they wanted, and thus sought the help of religious experts.

So what are you actually talking about? What isn’t answered here?